Consequences stop with a person

Every consequential actionwaits for a person.

An office runs on sign-off: someone with authority reviews the consequential step before it goes out. Chatticus applies the same boundary to every bot in the organization — sending, publishing, buying, deleting, and changing permissions all pause at an approval a person controls.

How it works

01

Proposed, not done

An approval controls what's about to happen.

It never pretends to undo work that already completed — it stops the consequential step before it happens, not after.

02

Narrow rules, human default

A require-approval rule always wins.

Auto-review rules can require approval, always allow, or never allow a specific action — but if a require-approval rule and an always-allow rule both match, approval wins. Broad rules like "allow everything in the browser" aren't accepted.

03

Locked steps stay locked

Passwords and payments hand back to a person.

For passwords, two-factor codes, CAPTCHAs, and payments, the computer hands back to a person for that one step, then returns control — nothing sensitive is pasted into a transcript.

Kept behind approval

What always waits for a person

  • Sending messages or invitations
  • Publishing content
  • Purchases and financial transfers
  • Deleting or overwriting data
  • Changing permissions
  • Production changes
  • Accepting legal terms
Where the boundary sits

Three places a person stays in the loop

Nothing proceeds unwatched

A consequential action reached with no one watching the screen stops on its own or waits on a pre-authorized rule — it never proceeds silently.

Checked where it lands

Policy checks run at every consequential system sink — the point where an action would actually take effect, not just where it was requested.

Resolved where you work

Approval cards and human takeover live in the product app, so a hold is resolved where you are already working instead of on the computer's own screen.

Read the product spec